There are numerous polystrate fossils, mostly trees, that protrude through several strata of the geologic column. Is it really possible these trees survived while. A polystrate fossil is a fossil of a single organism (such as a tree trunk) that extends through more than one geological stratum.‎Geological explanation · ‎Association with marine · ‎Quaternary examples. It is in deposits like these that soft body tissues are preserved as fossils. . He goes on to say that fossil polystrate trees are found only in the coarse-grained.


Author: Mrs. Dusty Wolf
Country: Chad
Language: English
Genre: Education
Published: 6 December 2016
Pages: 42
PDF File Size: 10.2 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.89 Mb
ISBN: 178-4-41649-826-4
Downloads: 82507
Price: Free
Uploader: Mrs. Dusty Wolf


The light animals refuse to stay in the shallow rocks, and the dense animals refuse to stay in the deep rocks where they belong according to creationism. Polystrate fossils flying dinosaurs are found no higher than the middle rocks, whereas birds are found mostly in the shallowest rocks.

"Polystrate" Tree Fossils

Turtles, dense creatures, tend to be found from middle to high polystrate fossils, not in the deep ones. Ammonites, light buoyant polystrate fossils molluscs that resemble the chambered nautilus, tend to be found in the lower and middle rocks, not in the upper ones.

There may be many hundreds of obviously distinct species of polystrate fossils of a given size and general shape; the same applies to ammonites. The ICR hydraulic selection theory predicts that many species of the same size, shape, and weight will be found scrambled together in the same rocks, but real rocks show that each polystrate fossils species usually has its own horizon absolutely distinct from the horizons of other species of the same size, shape, and weight.

Even within the same formation, geologists often find trilobites of the same size and shape segregated by species into horizontal layers.

Polystrate Fossils and the Geologic Column

Thus the hydraulic selection theory bristles with contradictions. Strangely enough, Whitcomb and Morrisstaunch champions of the hydraulic selection theory, show nothing but scorn for an orthodox geologist Daniel J.

Jones where he documents some small scale hydraulic selection. Polystrate fossils article merely describes in detail processes having nothing to do with evolution that experts observe in progress today moving microscopic fossils out of their proper order.

He describes wave action, turbidity currents, streams, ground water, wind, glaciers, burrowing animals, and other various processes. He even gives specific examples actually observed in various parts of polystrate fossils world today.


He lists evidences having nothing to do with faunal succession or evolution that should put an observer on his guard that the microfossils he is observing have been displaced.

For instance, if these microfossils are as large as polystrate fossils sediment they're buried with, then small scale hydraulic selection may have sorted them according to size out of their proper sequence.

Other telltale signs to look for are fragments of shells, lack of normal series of growth stages, and long fossils pointing polystrate fossils the same direction.


Whitcomb and Morris say that Jones is merely trying to rationalize away polystrate fossils that are in the wrong order for evolution by assuming without proof that the damning fossils polystrate fossils somehow moved out of order: It is not at all uncommon for the smaller fossils on which rock identification is commonly based to be found out of place in the expected sequences.

Such anomalies are usually explained as simple "displacements" Which, being interpreted, means that when fossils are not found in the stratum to which they have previously been assigned by evolutionary theory, it must be assumed that they have somehow been displaced subsequent to their original deposition.

Polystrate fossils - RationalWiki

polystrate fossils According to creationists, there are plenty of places where the fossils are in the wrong order for evolution. This must mean geologists have to assume evolution so as to arrange the geological time scale so as to date, the, fossils so as to erect an evolutionary sequence so as to prove evolution, thereby reasoning in a vicious circle.

When the fossils are in the wrong order, geologists apparently assume the "older" rocks were shoved on top of the younger ones thrust faultingor else, that the strata were overturned recumbent foldseven though there is no physical evidence for these processes. In particular, Whitcomb and Morris maintain the physical evidence proves the Lewis Overthrust and Heart M, ountain Overthrust never slid an inch.

Polystrate fossil

Whitcomb and Morris, again, quote their sources badly out of context. There is plenty polystrate fossils physical evidence having nothing to do with fossils or evolution that show thrust faulting to be very real. The Lewis Overthrust of Glacier National Park, Montana, consists of the deformed Precambrian limestones of the Belt Formation that were shoved along a horizontal thrust fault on top of much younger but viciously crumpled Cretaceous shales.